Both Passivhaus and EnerPHit are high-performance energy efficiency standards designed to reduce energy use, improve comfort, and lower carbon emissions.
While they share the same core principles, the key difference is that Passivhaus is for new buildings, whereas EnerPHit is specifically for refurbishing existing ones.
Passivhaus: The Gold Standard for New Builds
Passivhaus is a rigorous energy efficiency standard for new buildings, ensuring ultra-low energy consumption and high comfort. It is based on the following principles:
- Super Insulation – Thick layers of insulation are used in walls, roofs, and floors to minimise heat loss.
- Airtightness – Buildings are designed to be extremely airtight, preventing warm air from escaping and cold air from entering.
- High-Quality Windows and Doors – Triple-glazed windows and insulated doors help maintain indoor temperatures.
- Mechanical Ventilation with Heat Recovery (MVHR) – A ventilation system recovers heat from outgoing air while bringing in fresh air.
- No Thermal Bridges – The design ensures that there are no weak spots in insulation where heat could escape.
Because Passivhaus is applied to new buildings, it benefits from complete design flexibility to meet these strict standards.
EnerPHit: The Best Standard for Retrofit Projects
EnerPHit is a variation of the Passivhaus standard but designed for upgrading existing buildings. Since older structures often have design limitations, EnerPHit offers a more flexible approach while still delivering impressive energy efficiency improvements. The key features include:
- Upgraded Insulation – While full Passivhaus insulation levels may not always be possible, EnerPHit still requires significant improvements.
- Enhanced Airtightness – Gaps and leaks in the building fabric are sealed as much as possible to improve energy performance.
- Better Windows and Doors – Energy-efficient triple-glazed windows and well-insulated doors help reduce heat loss.
- Mechanical Ventilation with Heat Recovery (MVHR) – Where feasible, MVHR systems are installed to maintain fresh air without wasting heat.
- Minimised Thermal Bridges – Efforts are made to reduce thermal bridging, though existing structural constraints may limit full elimination.
Key Differences Between Passivhaus and EnerPHit
| Feature | Passivhaus (New Build) | EnerPHit (Retrofit) |
|---|---|---|
| Application | New buildings | Existing buildings |
| Insulation | Maximum levels applied | Improved where possible |
| Airtightness | Extremely airtight | Improved but may have some limits |
| Thermal Bridges | Eliminated entirely | Reduced as much as possible |
| Windows/Doors | Strict triple-glazed standard | Upgraded to high efficiency |
| Ventilation | Always includes MVHR | MVHR added where practical |
Which Standard is Right for You?
- If you are building a new home, Passivhaus is the best option, as it ensures the highest level of energy efficiency from the ground up.
- If you are improving an existing home, EnerPHit provides a practical way to achieve high energy savings while working with existing building constraints.
Passivhaus is for new builds whereas EnerPHit allows old builds to be made more sustainable
Passivhaus and EnerPHit both aim to dramatically cut energy use and improve indoor comfort, but they are designed for different types of projects.
Passivhaus applies to new builds, allowing for complete design control to achieve the highest efficiency standards.
EnerPHit, on the other hand, is a more flexible approach for existing buildings, offering the best possible energy performance within the constraints of the original structure.
Whichever route you take, both standards provide long-term savings, better comfort, and a reduced carbon footprint.